Uncertainty in AI | Stanford HAI
Stanford
University
  • Stanford Home
  • Maps & Directions
  • Search Stanford
  • Emergency Info
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Copyright
  • Trademarks
  • Non-Discrimination
  • Accessibility
© Stanford University.  Stanford, California 94305.
Skip to content
  • About

    • About
    • People
    • Get Involved with HAI
    • Support HAI
    • Subscribe to Email
  • Research

    • Research
    • Fellowship Programs
    • Grants
    • Student Affinity Groups
    • Centers & Labs
    • Research Publications
    • Research Partners
  • Education

    • Education
    • Executive and Professional Education
    • Government and Policymakers
    • K-12
    • Stanford Students
  • Policy

    • Policy
    • Policy Publications
    • Policymaker Education
    • Student Opportunities
  • AI Index

    • AI Index
    • AI Index Report
    • Global Vibrancy Tool
    • People
  • News
  • Events
  • Industry
  • Centers & Labs
Navigate
  • About
  • Events
  • AI Glossary
  • Careers
  • Search
Participate
  • Get Involved
  • Support HAI
  • Contact Us

Stay Up To Date

Get the latest news, advances in research, policy work, and education program updates from HAI in your inbox weekly.

Sign Up For Latest News

Your browser does not support the video tag.
eventWorkshop

Uncertainty in AI

Status
Past
Date
Tuesday, December 10, 2019 3:00 PM - 4:00 PM PST/PDT
Topics
Machine Learning

Faculty Leaders: Elaine Treharne and Mark Algee-Hewitt

 

This workshop focused on “Uncertainty in AI Situations” asks researchers to consider what
an AI can do when faced with uncertainty. Machine learning algorithms whose
classifications rely on posterior probabilities of membership often present ambiguous
results, where due to unavailable training data or ambiguous cases, the likelihood of any
outcome is approximately even. In such situations, the human programmers must decide
how the machine handles ambiguity: whether making a “best-fit” classification or reporting
potential error, there is always a potential conflict between the mathematical rigor of the
model and the ambiguity of real-world use cases.

Some questions asked that begin the process of advancing AI to a new intellectual understanding of the trickiest problems in the machine-learning environment.

• How do researchers create training sets that engage with uncertainty, particularly
when deciding between reflecting real-world data and curating data sets to avoid
bias?
• How can we frame ontologies, typologies, and epistemologies that can account for,
and help solve, ambiguity in data and indecision in AI?

Share
Link copied to clipboard!

Related Events

Arvind Narayanan | Adapting to the Transformation of Knowledge Work
May 18, 202612:00 PM - 1:00 PM
May
18
2026

The possibility that AI will automate most cognitive labor is worth taking seriously. How should we adapt to this transformation? I start from the perspective, articulated in the essay “AI as normal technology”, that the true bottlenecks lie downstream of capabilities and that AI’s impacts will unfold gradually over decades. If this is true, there are major gaps in our current evidence infrastructure, because it over-emphasizes the capability layer.

Event

Arvind Narayanan | Adapting to the Transformation of Knowledge Work

May 18, 202612:00 PM - 1:00 PM

The possibility that AI will automate most cognitive labor is worth taking seriously. How should we adapt to this transformation? I start from the perspective, articulated in the essay “AI as normal technology”, that the true bottlenecks lie downstream of capabilities and that AI’s impacts will unfold gradually over decades. If this is true, there are major gaps in our current evidence infrastructure, because it over-emphasizes the capability layer.

Inside the 2026 AI Index Report | Stanford HAI
SeminarMay 20, 202612:00 PM - 1:15 PM
May
20
2026

The AI Index, currently in its ninth year, tracks, collates, distills, and visualizes data relating to artificial intelligence.

Seminar

Inside the 2026 AI Index Report | Stanford HAI

May 20, 202612:00 PM - 1:15 PM

The AI Index, currently in its ninth year, tracks, collates, distills, and visualizes data relating to artificial intelligence.

This workshop focused on “Uncertainty in AI Situations” asks researchers to consider what
an AI can do when faced with uncertainty. Machine learning algorithms whose
classifications rely on posterior probabilities of membership often present ambiguous
results, where due to unavailable training data or ambiguous cases, the likelihood of any
outcome is approximately even. In such situations, the human programmers must decide
how the machine handles ambiguity: whether making a “best-fit” classification or reporting
potential error, there is always a potential conflict between the mathematical rigor of the
model and the ambiguity of real-world use cases.

Some questions asked that begin the process of advancing AI to a new intellectual understanding of the trickiest problems in the machine-learning environment.

• How do researchers create training sets that engage with uncertainty, particularly
when deciding between reflecting real-world data and curating data sets to avoid
bias?
• How can we frame ontologies, typologies, and epistemologies that can account for,
and help solve, ambiguity in data and indecision in AI?


Elaine Treharne
Roberta Bowman Denning Professor of Humanities, and by courtesy, of German Studies
Mark Algee Hewitt
Assistant Professor of English, Stanford University