Stanford
University
  • Stanford Home
  • Maps & Directions
  • Search Stanford
  • Emergency Info
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Copyright
  • Trademarks
  • Non-Discrimination
  • Accessibility
© Stanford University.  Stanford, California 94305.
Uncertainty in AI | Stanford HAI
Skip to content
  • About

    • About
    • People
    • Get Involved with HAI
    • Support HAI
    • Subscribe to Email
  • Research

    • Research
    • Fellowship Programs
    • Grants
    • Student Affinity Groups
    • Centers & Labs
    • Research Publications
    • Research Partners
  • Education

    • Education
    • Executive and Professional Education
    • Government and Policymakers
    • K-12
    • Stanford Students
  • Policy

    • Policy
    • Policy Publications
    • Policymaker Education
    • Student Opportunities
  • AI Index

    • AI Index
    • AI Index Report
    • Global Vibrancy Tool
    • People
  • News
  • Events
  • Industry
  • Centers & Labs
Navigate
  • About
  • Events
  • Careers
  • Search
Participate
  • Get Involved
  • Support HAI
  • Contact Us

Stay Up To Date

Get the latest news, advances in research, policy work, and education program updates from HAI in your inbox weekly.

Sign Up For Latest News

Your browser does not support the video tag.
eventWorkshop

Uncertainty in AI

Status
Past
Date
Tuesday, December 10, 2019 3:00 PM - 4:00 PM PST/PDT
Topics
Machine Learning

Faculty Leaders: Elaine Treharne and Mark Algee-Hewitt

 

This workshop focused on “Uncertainty in AI Situations” asks researchers to consider what
an AI can do when faced with uncertainty. Machine learning algorithms whose
classifications rely on posterior probabilities of membership often present ambiguous
results, where due to unavailable training data or ambiguous cases, the likelihood of any
outcome is approximately even. In such situations, the human programmers must decide
how the machine handles ambiguity: whether making a “best-fit” classification or reporting
potential error, there is always a potential conflict between the mathematical rigor of the
model and the ambiguity of real-world use cases.

Some questions asked that begin the process of advancing AI to a new intellectual understanding of the trickiest problems in the machine-learning environment.

• How do researchers create training sets that engage with uncertainty, particularly
when deciding between reflecting real-world data and curating data sets to avoid
bias?
• How can we frame ontologies, typologies, and epistemologies that can account for,
and help solve, ambiguity in data and indecision in AI?

Share
Link copied to clipboard!

Related Events

Zoë Hitzig | How People Use ChatGPT
Mar 09, 202612:00 PM - 1:00 PM
March
09
2026

Despite the rapid adoption of LLM chatbots, little is known about how they are used. We approach this question theoretically and empirically, modeling a user who chooses whether to complete a task herself, ask the chatbot for information that reduces decision noise, or delegate execution to the chatbot...

Event

Zoë Hitzig | How People Use ChatGPT

Mar 09, 202612:00 PM - 1:00 PM

Despite the rapid adoption of LLM chatbots, little is known about how they are used. We approach this question theoretically and empirically, modeling a user who chooses whether to complete a task herself, ask the chatbot for information that reduces decision noise, or delegate execution to the chatbot...

Joel Becker | Reconciling Impressive AI Benchmark Performance with Limited Developer Productivity Impacts
Mar 16, 202612:00 PM - 1:00 PM
March
16
2026

AI coding agents now complete multi-hour coding benchmarks with roughly 50% reliability, yet a randomized trial found experienced open-source developers took about 19% longer when allowed frontier AI tools than when tools were disallowed...

Event

Joel Becker | Reconciling Impressive AI Benchmark Performance with Limited Developer Productivity Impacts

Mar 16, 202612:00 PM - 1:00 PM

AI coding agents now complete multi-hour coding benchmarks with roughly 50% reliability, yet a randomized trial found experienced open-source developers took about 19% longer when allowed frontier AI tools than when tools were disallowed...

Dan Iancu & Antonio Skillicorn | Interpretable Machine Learning and Mixed Datasets for Predicting Child Labor in Ghana’s Cocoa Sector
SeminarMar 18, 202612:00 PM - 1:15 PM
March
18
2026

Child labor remains prevalent in Ghana’s cocoa sector and is associated with adverse educational and health outcomes for children.

Seminar

Dan Iancu & Antonio Skillicorn | Interpretable Machine Learning and Mixed Datasets for Predicting Child Labor in Ghana’s Cocoa Sector

Mar 18, 202612:00 PM - 1:15 PM

Child labor remains prevalent in Ghana’s cocoa sector and is associated with adverse educational and health outcomes for children.

This workshop focused on “Uncertainty in AI Situations” asks researchers to consider what
an AI can do when faced with uncertainty. Machine learning algorithms whose
classifications rely on posterior probabilities of membership often present ambiguous
results, where due to unavailable training data or ambiguous cases, the likelihood of any
outcome is approximately even. In such situations, the human programmers must decide
how the machine handles ambiguity: whether making a “best-fit” classification or reporting
potential error, there is always a potential conflict between the mathematical rigor of the
model and the ambiguity of real-world use cases.

Some questions asked that begin the process of advancing AI to a new intellectual understanding of the trickiest problems in the machine-learning environment.

• How do researchers create training sets that engage with uncertainty, particularly
when deciding between reflecting real-world data and curating data sets to avoid
bias?
• How can we frame ontologies, typologies, and epistemologies that can account for,
and help solve, ambiguity in data and indecision in AI?


Elaine Treharne
Roberta Bowman Denning Professor of Humanities, and by courtesy, of German Studies
Mark Algee Hewitt
Assistant Professor of English, Stanford University