HAI Weekly Seminar with Kathleen Creel | Stanford HAI
Stanford
University
  • Stanford Home
  • Maps & Directions
  • Search Stanford
  • Emergency Info
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Copyright
  • Trademarks
  • Non-Discrimination
  • Accessibility
© Stanford University.  Stanford, California 94305.
Skip to content
  • About

    • About
    • People
    • Get Involved with HAI
    • Support HAI
    • Subscribe to Email
  • Research

    • Research
    • Fellowship Programs
    • Grants
    • Student Affinity Groups
    • Centers & Labs
    • Research Publications
    • Research Partners
  • Education

    • Education
    • Executive and Professional Education
    • Government and Policymakers
    • K-12
    • Stanford Students
  • Policy

    • Policy
    • Policy Publications
    • Policymaker Education
    • Student Opportunities
  • AI Index

    • AI Index
    • AI Index Report
    • Global Vibrancy Tool
    • People
  • News
  • Events
  • Industry
  • Centers & Labs
Navigate
  • About
  • Events
  • AI Glossary
  • Careers
  • Search
Participate
  • Get Involved
  • Support HAI
  • Contact Us

Stay Up To Date

Get the latest news, advances in research, policy work, and education program updates from HAI in your inbox weekly.

Sign Up For Latest News

Your browser does not support the video tag.
eventSeminar

HAI Weekly Seminar with Kathleen Creel

Status
Past
Date
Wednesday, May 25, 2022 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM PST/PDT
Location
Virtual
Share
Link copied to clipboard!
Event Contact
Kaci Peel
kpeel@stanford.edu

Related Events

Ashesh Rambachan | From Next-Token Prediction to Automatic Induction of Automata
Apr 13, 202612:00 PM - 1:00 PM
April
13
2026

Sequence data is ubiquitous in economics — job histories in labor economics, diagnosis and treatment sequences in health economics, strategic interactions in game theory. Generative sequence models can learn to predict these sequences well, but their complexity makes it hard to extract interpretable economic insights from their predictions.

Event

Ashesh Rambachan | From Next-Token Prediction to Automatic Induction of Automata

Apr 13, 202612:00 PM - 1:00 PM

Sequence data is ubiquitous in economics — job histories in labor economics, diagnosis and treatment sequences in health economics, strategic interactions in game theory. Generative sequence models can learn to predict these sequences well, but their complexity makes it hard to extract interpretable economic insights from their predictions.

Caroline Meinhardt, Thomas Mullaney, Juan N. Pava, and Diyi Yang | How Can AI Support Language Digitization and Digital Inclusion?
SeminarApr 15, 202612:00 PM - 1:15 PM
April
15
2026

What does digital inclusion look like in the age of AI? Over 6,000 of the world’s 7,000-plus living languages remain digitally disadvantaged.

Seminar

Caroline Meinhardt, Thomas Mullaney, Juan N. Pava, and Diyi Yang | How Can AI Support Language Digitization and Digital Inclusion?

Apr 15, 202612:00 PM - 1:15 PM

What does digital inclusion look like in the age of AI? Over 6,000 of the world’s 7,000-plus living languages remain digitally disadvantaged.

Matt Beane | Precision Proactivity: Measuring Cognitive Load in Real-World AI-Assisted Work
Apr 20, 202612:00 PM - 1:00 PM
April
20
2026

Systems like ChatGPT and Claude assist billions through proactive dialogue—offering unsolicited, task-relevant information. Drawing on Cognitive Load Theory, we study how cognitive load shapes performance in AI assisted knowledge work.

Event

Matt Beane | Precision Proactivity: Measuring Cognitive Load in Real-World AI-Assisted Work

Apr 20, 202612:00 PM - 1:00 PM

Systems like ChatGPT and Claude assist billions through proactive dialogue—offering unsolicited, task-relevant information. Drawing on Cognitive Load Theory, we study how cognitive load shapes performance in AI assisted knowledge work.

Picking on the Same Person: Does Algorithmic Monoculture Homogenize Outcomes?

Using the same machine learning model for high-stakes decisions in many settings amplifies the strengths, weaknesses, biases, and idiosyncrasies of the original model. When the same person re-encounters the same model again and again, or models trained on the same dataset, she might be wrongly rejected again and again. Thus algorithmic monoculture could lead to consistent ill-treatment of individual people by homogenizing the decision outcomes they experience. This talk will formalize the measure of outcome homogenization, describe experiments on US census data that demonstrate that the sharing of training data consistently homogenizes outcomes, then present an ethical argument for why and in what circumstances outcome homogenization is wrong.

Speakers

Kathleen CreelKathleen Creel

HAI Network Affiliate; Assistant Professor of Philosophy and Computer Science, Northeastern University

No tweets available.