Hélène Landemore: Can AI Bring Deliberation to the Masses? | Stanford HAI
Stanford
University
  • Stanford Home
  • Maps & Directions
  • Search Stanford
  • Emergency Info
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Copyright
  • Trademarks
  • Non-Discrimination
  • Accessibility
© Stanford University.  Stanford, California 94305.
Skip to content
  • About

    • About
    • People
    • Get Involved with HAI
    • Support HAI
    • Subscribe to Email
  • Research

    • Research
    • Fellowship Programs
    • Grants
    • Student Affinity Groups
    • Centers & Labs
    • Research Publications
    • Research Partners
  • Education

    • Education
    • Executive and Professional Education
    • Government and Policymakers
    • K-12
    • Stanford Students
  • Policy

    • Policy
    • Policy Publications
    • Policymaker Education
    • Student Opportunities
  • AI Index

    • AI Index
    • AI Index Report
    • Global Vibrancy Tool
    • People
  • News
  • Events
  • Industry
  • Centers & Labs
Navigate
  • About
  • Events
  • AI Glossary
  • Careers
  • Search
Participate
  • Get Involved
  • Support HAI
  • Contact Us

Stay Up To Date

Get the latest news, advances in research, policy work, and education program updates from HAI in your inbox weekly.

Sign Up For Latest News

eventSeminar

Hélène Landemore: Can AI Bring Deliberation to the Masses?

Status
Past
Date
Wednesday, October 19, 2022 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM PST/PDT
Location
Hybrid 
Share
Link copied to clipboard!
Event Contact
Madeleine Wright
mwright7@stanford.edu

Related Events

Ashesh Rambachan | From Next-Token Prediction to Automatic Induction of Automata
Apr 13, 202612:00 PM - 1:00 PM
April
13
2026

Sequence data is ubiquitous in economics — job histories in labor economics, diagnosis and treatment sequences in health economics, strategic interactions in game theory. Generative sequence models can learn to predict these sequences well, but their complexity makes it hard to extract interpretable economic insights from their predictions.

Event

Ashesh Rambachan | From Next-Token Prediction to Automatic Induction of Automata

Apr 13, 202612:00 PM - 1:00 PM

Sequence data is ubiquitous in economics — job histories in labor economics, diagnosis and treatment sequences in health economics, strategic interactions in game theory. Generative sequence models can learn to predict these sequences well, but their complexity makes it hard to extract interpretable economic insights from their predictions.

Caroline Meinhardt, Thomas Mullaney, Juan N. Pava, and Diyi Yang | How Can AI Support Language Digitization and Digital Inclusion?
SeminarApr 15, 202612:00 PM - 1:15 PM
April
15
2026

What does digital inclusion look like in the age of AI? Over 6,000 of the world’s 7,000-plus living languages remain digitally disadvantaged.

Seminar

Caroline Meinhardt, Thomas Mullaney, Juan N. Pava, and Diyi Yang | How Can AI Support Language Digitization and Digital Inclusion?

Apr 15, 202612:00 PM - 1:15 PM

What does digital inclusion look like in the age of AI? Over 6,000 of the world’s 7,000-plus living languages remain digitally disadvantaged.

Matt Beane | Precision Proactivity: Measuring Cognitive Load in Real-World AI-Assisted Work
Apr 20, 202612:00 PM - 1:00 PM
April
20
2026

Systems like ChatGPT and Claude assist billions through proactive dialogue—offering unsolicited, task-relevant information. Drawing on Cognitive Load Theory, we study how cognitive load shapes performance in AI assisted knowledge work.

Event

Matt Beane | Precision Proactivity: Measuring Cognitive Load in Real-World AI-Assisted Work

Apr 20, 202612:00 PM - 1:00 PM

Systems like ChatGPT and Claude assist billions through proactive dialogue—offering unsolicited, task-relevant information. Drawing on Cognitive Load Theory, we study how cognitive load shapes performance in AI assisted knowledge work.

HAI Weekly Seminar

Can AI Bring Deliberation to the Masses?

One unsolved problem in democratic theory is how we can reconcile the twin goals of quality deliberation and mass participation. Both are arguably conditions for the full legitimacy of a democratic system. Quality deliberation, as a process through which laws and policies are generated, in theory promises good governance (output-legitimacy) as well as, at the very least, good reasons for the laws and policies put forward. Mass participation, by contrast, is a condition for the democratic input-legitimacy of the system, namely its capacity to take into account people’s needs and preferences. Unfortunately, thus far, it has proven impossible to reconcile those two goals as the quality of deliberation diminishes past a relatively low threshold of participants (a few hundreds, perhaps a few thousand people) and mass participation, on the other hand, is not conducive to the thoughtful, informed exchanges smaller numbers afford. In this presentation, Hélène Landemore explores the ways in which Artificial Intelligence may help bridge that gap, at least up to a point.

Speakers

Helene LandemoreHélène Landemore

Professor of Political Science, Yale University

No tweets available.