Stanford
University
  • Stanford Home
  • Maps & Directions
  • Search Stanford
  • Emergency Info
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Copyright
  • Trademarks
  • Non-Discrimination
  • Accessibility
© Stanford University.  Stanford, California 94305.
AI and International Security | Stanford HAI
Skip to content
  • About

    • About
    • People
    • Get Involved with HAI
    • Support HAI
    • Subscribe to Email
  • Research

    • Research
    • Fellowship Programs
    • Grants
    • Student Affinity Groups
    • Centers & Labs
    • Research Publications
    • Research Partners
  • Education

    • Education
    • Executive and Professional Education
    • Government and Policymakers
    • K-12
    • Stanford Students
  • Policy

    • Policy
    • Policy Publications
    • Policymaker Education
    • Student Opportunities
  • AI Index

    • AI Index
    • AI Index Report
    • Global Vibrancy Tool
    • People
  • News
  • Events
  • Industry
  • Centers & Labs
Navigate
  • About
  • Events
  • Careers
  • Search
Participate
  • Get Involved
  • Support HAI
  • Contact Us

Stay Up To Date

Get the latest news, advances in research, policy work, and education program updates from HAI in your inbox weekly.

Sign Up For Latest News

Your browser does not support the video tag.
eventWorkshop

AI and International Security

Status
Past
Date
Wednesday, February 26, 2020 9:00 AM - 12:00 PM PST/PDT

Workshop Leader: Emilie Silva

A one-day interdisciplinary workshop involving Stanford faculty and researchers, a select number of outside academics from other institutions, and a small number of private sector and governmental analysts to focus on the intersection of AI and various aspects of international security. The goal was to identify concrete research agendas and synergies, identify gaps in our understanding, and build a network of scholars and experts to address these challenges.

The past several years have seen startling advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning,
driven in part by advances in deep neural networks.3 AI-enabled machines can now meet or exceed
human abilities in a wide range of tasks, including chess, Jeopardy, Go, poker, object recognition,
and driving in some settings. AI systems are being applied to solve a range of problems in
transportation, finance, stock trading, health care, intelligence analysis, and cybersecurity. Despite
calls from prominent scientists to avoid militarizing AI,4 nation-states are certain to use AI and
machine learning tools for national security purposes.

A technology that has the potential for such sweeping changes across human society should be
evaluated for its potential effects on international stability. Many national security applications of
AI could be beneficial, such as advanced cyber defenses that can identify new malware, automated
computer security tools to find and patch vulnerabilities, or machine learning systems to uncover
suspicious behavior by terrorists. Current AI systems have substantial limitations and
vulnerabilities, however, and a headlong rush into national security applications of artificial
intelligence could pose risks to international stability. Some security related applications of AI
could be destabilizing, and competitive dynamics between nations could lead to harmful
consequences such as a “race to the bottom” on AI safety. Other security related applications of AI
could improve international stability.

CNAS is undertaking a two-year, in-depth, interdisciplinary project to examine how artificial
intelligence will influence international security and stability. It is critical for global stability to
begin to a discussion about ways to mitigate the risks while taking advantage of the benefits of
autonomous systems and artificial intelligence. This project will build a community from three
sectors of academia, business, and the policy world that often do not intersect – AI researchers in
academia and business; international security academic experts; and policy practitioners in the
government, both civilian and military. Through a series of workshops, commissioned papers, and
reports, this project will foster a community of practice and begin laying the foundations for a field
of study on AI and international security. The project will conclude with recommendations to
policymakers for ways to capitalize on the potential stabilizing benefits of artificial intelligence,
while avoiding uses that could undermine stability.

Share
Link copied to clipboard!

Related Events

Zoë Hitzig | How People Use ChatGPT
Mar 09, 202612:00 PM - 1:00 PM
March
09
2026

Despite the rapid adoption of LLM chatbots, little is known about how they are used. We approach this question theoretically and empirically, modeling a user who chooses whether to complete a task herself, ask the chatbot for information that reduces decision noise, or delegate execution to the chatbot...

Event

Zoë Hitzig | How People Use ChatGPT

Mar 09, 202612:00 PM - 1:00 PM

Despite the rapid adoption of LLM chatbots, little is known about how they are used. We approach this question theoretically and empirically, modeling a user who chooses whether to complete a task herself, ask the chatbot for information that reduces decision noise, or delegate execution to the chatbot...

Hari Subramonyam | Learning by Creating: A Human-Centered Vision for AI in Education
SeminarMar 11, 202612:00 PM - 1:15 PM
March
11
2026
Seminar

Hari Subramonyam | Learning by Creating: A Human-Centered Vision for AI in Education

Mar 11, 202612:00 PM - 1:15 PM
Joel Becker | Reconciling Impressive AI Benchmark Performance with Limited Developer Productivity Impacts
Mar 16, 202612:00 PM - 1:00 PM
March
16
2026

AI coding agents now complete multi-hour coding benchmarks with roughly 50% reliability, yet a randomized trial found experienced open-source developers took about 19% longer when allowed frontier AI tools than when tools were disallowed...

Event

Joel Becker | Reconciling Impressive AI Benchmark Performance with Limited Developer Productivity Impacts

Mar 16, 202612:00 PM - 1:00 PM

AI coding agents now complete multi-hour coding benchmarks with roughly 50% reliability, yet a randomized trial found experienced open-source developers took about 19% longer when allowed frontier AI tools than when tools were disallowed...