Stanford
University
  • Stanford Home
  • Maps & Directions
  • Search Stanford
  • Emergency Info
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Copyright
  • Trademarks
  • Non-Discrimination
  • Accessibility
© Stanford University.  Stanford, California 94305.
Navigate
  • About
  • Events
  • AI Glossary
  • Careers
  • Search
Participate
  • Get Involved
  • Support HAI
  • Contact Us
Skip to content
  • About

    • About
    • People
    • Get Involved with HAI
    • Support HAI
    • Subscribe to Email
  • Research

    • Research
    • Research Programs
    • Grants
    • Marlowe (opens in new tab)
    • Student Affinity Groups
    • Centers & Labs
    • Research Publications
    • Research Partners
  • Education

    • Education
    • Executive and Professional Education
    • Government and Policymakers
    • K-12
    • Stanford Students
  • Policy

    • Policy
    • Policy Publications
    • Policymaker Education
    • Student Opportunities
  • AI Index

    • AI Index
    • AI Index Report
    • Global Vibrancy Tool
    • People
  • News
  • Events
  • Industry
  • Centers & Labs

Stay Up To Date

Get the latest news, advances in research, policy work, and education program updates from HAI in your inbox weekly.

Sign Up For Latest News

The Healthcare Policies of the November 2026 Candidates | Stanford HAI
research

The Healthcare Policies of the November 2026 Candidates

Date
October 20, 2026
Topics
Healthcare
Regulation, Policy, Governance
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Read Paper
abstract

Recent polls show that healthcare costs are a top affordability concern for American adults and that a large majority of adults, 90% of Democrats and 75% of Republicans, support a fundamental redesign or major changes to our healthcare system. Across states, political parties, and different types of office, politicians and constituents hold different views on healthcare policies and support different proposals. Various stakeholders such as patients, physicians, nurses, veterans, employers, and industry groups could potentially benefit from access to data on how their representatives’ views align with their own. There is no systematic, openly available database and analysis of these views. We sought to create the first systematic, openly available database and analysis of the healthcare policies and proposals of the leading candidates in the November 2026 elections and beyond.

Almost every candidate for the November 2026 elections mentions healthcare on their campaign website, but Democrats and Republicans differ in the number of issues they discuss and their policies on the issues, with a few areas of agreement including drug pricing, mental health, and substance use. There appears to be a significant need for novel policy proposals that can bridge the gap between the concerns of the electorate focused on affordability and significant reform and the limited menu of policy responses proposed by political candidates.

Share
Link copied to clipboard!
Authors
  • David Scheinker
    David Scheinker
  • Kevin Schulman
    Kevin Schulman
  • Anton Backer
  • Maya Shah

Related Publications

Roles for AI in Implementation of Medicaid Work Requirements
Michelle Mello, Himaja Nagireddy
Quick ReadSep 03, 2026
Research
Your browser does not support the video tag.

By January 2027, 44 state Medicaid programs must redetermine the eligibility of millions of beneficiaries under criteria in the 2025 budget reconciliation law (HR 1). Among the changes are “community engagement” (work) requirements and increased redetermination cadence (from annual to at least semiannual). In preparation, state Medicaid agencies have been exploring technological solutions to automate redeterminations at scale, including artificial intelligence (AI). Six agencies have decided to use AI tools so far and 21 states are considering use of them. Strategic deployment of AI can help states tackle the redetermination juggernaut, but overly broad or hasty deployment could compound the harms of HR 1.

Research
Your browser does not support the video tag.

Roles for AI in Implementation of Medicaid Work Requirements

Michelle Mello, Himaja Nagireddy
HealthcareRegulation, Policy, GovernanceQuick ReadSep 03

By January 2027, 44 state Medicaid programs must redetermine the eligibility of millions of beneficiaries under criteria in the 2025 budget reconciliation law (HR 1). Among the changes are “community engagement” (work) requirements and increased redetermination cadence (from annual to at least semiannual). In preparation, state Medicaid agencies have been exploring technological solutions to automate redeterminations at scale, including artificial intelligence (AI). Six agencies have decided to use AI tools so far and 21 states are considering use of them. Strategic deployment of AI can help states tackle the redetermination juggernaut, but overly broad or hasty deployment could compound the harms of HR 1.

Addressing Medical Affordability Without Compromising Care
Kevin Schulman, Ezekiel J. Emanuel, MD, PhD
Quick ReadJul 09, 2026
Research
Your browser does not support the video tag.

The US spends 25 percent of all health care costs on administration, a big part of which involves billing for medical services. To realize savings requires standardizing and digitizing billing.

Research
Your browser does not support the video tag.

Addressing Medical Affordability Without Compromising Care

Kevin Schulman, Ezekiel J. Emanuel, MD, PhD
HealthcareRegulation, Policy, GovernanceQuick ReadJul 09

The US spends 25 percent of all health care costs on administration, a big part of which involves billing for medical services. To realize savings requires standardizing and digitizing billing.

Utah's Experiment With AI-Driven Prescription Renewals
Michelle Mello
Quick ReadMar 19, 2026
Research
Your browser does not support the video tag.

In January 2026, Utah announced a first-of-its kind pilot program allowing an autonomous artificial intelligence (AI) agent to renew prescriptions for consumers who request it. The state agreed not to enforce its unprofessional conduct laws against the developer, Doctronic, if the company adheres to a contract that includes safety and privacy protections. The pilot program includes 192 drugs for chronic conditions. Although physicians will initially validate the AI’s actions, the pilot program will swiftly become one of the first deployments at scale of an autonomous, agentic system in medicine. The announcement prompted concern from associations of physicians and pharmacists who opined that AI “should NOT be making care decisions.”

Research
Your browser does not support the video tag.

Utah's Experiment With AI-Driven Prescription Renewals

Michelle Mello
HealthcareRegulation, Policy, GovernanceQuick ReadMar 19

In January 2026, Utah announced a first-of-its kind pilot program allowing an autonomous artificial intelligence (AI) agent to renew prescriptions for consumers who request it. The state agreed not to enforce its unprofessional conduct laws against the developer, Doctronic, if the company adheres to a contract that includes safety and privacy protections. The pilot program includes 192 drugs for chronic conditions. Although physicians will initially validate the AI’s actions, the pilot program will swiftly become one of the first deployments at scale of an autonomous, agentic system in medicine. The announcement prompted concern from associations of physicians and pharmacists who opined that AI “should NOT be making care decisions.”

The AI Arms Race In Health Insurance Utilization Review: Promises Of Efficiency And Risks Of Supercharged Flaws
Michelle Mello, Artem Trotsyuk, Abdoul Jalil Djiberou Mahamadou, Danton Char
Quick ReadJan 06, 2026
Research
Your browser does not support the video tag.

Health insurers and health care provider organizations are increasingly using artificial intelligence (AI) tools in prior authorization and claims processes. AI offers many potential benefits, but its adoption has raised concerns about the role of the “humans in the loop,” users’ understanding of AI, opacity of algorithmic determinations, underperformance in certain tasks, automation bias, and unintended social consequences. To date, institutional governance by insurers and providers has not fully met the challenge of ensuring responsible use. However, several steps could be taken to help realize the benefits of AI use while minimizing risks. Drawing on empirical work on AI use and our own ethical assessments of provider-facing tools as part of the AI governance process at Stanford Health Care, we examine why utilization review has attracted so much AI innovation and why it is challenging to ensure responsible use of AI. We conclude with several steps that could be taken to help realize the benefits of AI use while minimizing risks.

Research
Your browser does not support the video tag.

The AI Arms Race In Health Insurance Utilization Review: Promises Of Efficiency And Risks Of Supercharged Flaws

Michelle Mello, Artem Trotsyuk, Abdoul Jalil Djiberou Mahamadou, Danton Char
HealthcareRegulation, Policy, GovernanceQuick ReadJan 06

Health insurers and health care provider organizations are increasingly using artificial intelligence (AI) tools in prior authorization and claims processes. AI offers many potential benefits, but its adoption has raised concerns about the role of the “humans in the loop,” users’ understanding of AI, opacity of algorithmic determinations, underperformance in certain tasks, automation bias, and unintended social consequences. To date, institutional governance by insurers and providers has not fully met the challenge of ensuring responsible use. However, several steps could be taken to help realize the benefits of AI use while minimizing risks. Drawing on empirical work on AI use and our own ethical assessments of provider-facing tools as part of the AI governance process at Stanford Health Care, we examine why utilization review has attracted so much AI innovation and why it is challenging to ensure responsible use of AI. We conclude with several steps that could be taken to help realize the benefits of AI use while minimizing risks.