Stanford
University
  • Stanford Home
  • Maps & Directions
  • Search Stanford
  • Emergency Info
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Copyright
  • Trademarks
  • Non-Discrimination
  • Accessibility
© Stanford University.  Stanford, California 94305.
2 Stanford experts say AI won’t transform healthcare until the 2030s | Stanford HAI
Skip to content
  • About

    • About
    • People
    • Get Involved with HAI
    • Support HAI
    • Subscribe to Email
  • Research

    • Research
    • Fellowship Programs
    • Grants
    • Student Affinity Groups
    • Centers & Labs
    • Research Publications
    • Research Partners
  • Education

    • Education
    • Executive and Professional Education
    • Government and Policymakers
    • K-12
    • Stanford Students
  • Policy

    • Policy
    • Policy Publications
    • Policymaker Education
    • Student Opportunities
  • AI Index

    • AI Index
    • AI Index Report
    • Global Vibrancy Tool
    • People
  • News
  • Events
  • Industry
  • Centers & Labs
Navigate
  • About
  • Events
  • AI Glossary
  • Careers
  • Search
Participate
  • Get Involved
  • Support HAI
  • Contact Us

Stay Up To Date

Get the latest news, advances in research, policy work, and education program updates from HAI in your inbox weekly.

Sign Up For Latest News

news

2 Stanford experts say AI won’t transform healthcare until the 2030s

Date
April 30, 2021
Your browser does not support the video tag.

HAI Co-Director Fei-Fei Li and Andrew Ng, Stanford Professor and Founder of DeepLearning, share their thoughts in a co-hosted event on Healthcare's AI Future

Share
Link copied to clipboard!
Contributor(s)
Ruth Reader

Related News

Your Boss, Tech Companies And Police Can Read Your Chatbot Conversations
Washington Post
Aug 31, 2026
Media Mention

HAI Policy Fellow Jennifer King discusses privacy issues with AI chatbots, saying, “Unless you are having a chat with a service that has a temporary chat or, basically, an incognito version ... [and] you’re also having it within a browser that’s not tracking you, the answer is no. You can’t be sure that it’ll be totally private."

Media Mention
Your browser does not support the video tag.

Your Boss, Tech Companies And Police Can Read Your Chatbot Conversations

Washington Post
Privacy, Safety, SecurityAug 31

HAI Policy Fellow Jennifer King discusses privacy issues with AI chatbots, saying, “Unless you are having a chat with a service that has a temporary chat or, basically, an incognito version ... [and] you’re also having it within a browser that’s not tracking you, the answer is no. You can’t be sure that it’ll be totally private."

California's Data And Privacy Laws Aren't Being Followed
Marketplace
Aug 25, 2026
Media Mention

The state's Delete Act was supposed to give Californians a one-stop-shop to request their online information be deleted. But only a minority of registered data brokers are abiding by those laws, says Jennifer King, privacy and data policy fellow at the Stanford University Institute for Human-Centered AI.

Media Mention
Your browser does not support the video tag.

California's Data And Privacy Laws Aren't Being Followed

Marketplace
Privacy, Safety, SecurityRegulation, Policy, GovernanceAug 25

The state's Delete Act was supposed to give Californians a one-stop-shop to request their online information be deleted. But only a minority of registered data brokers are abiding by those laws, says Jennifer King, privacy and data policy fellow at the Stanford University Institute for Human-Centered AI.

Your ‘For You’ Algorithm Disagrees With You
Andrew Myers
Aug 18, 2026
News
illustration of a woman staring at her phone that's filled with unhappy and angry emojis

A new Stanford-led study finds that X’s “For You” algorithm mistakes outrage for interest – and fills your feed accordingly.

News
illustration of a woman staring at her phone that's filled with unhappy and angry emojis

Your ‘For You’ Algorithm Disagrees With You

Andrew Myers
Design, Human-Computer InteractionAug 18

A new Stanford-led study finds that X’s “For You” algorithm mistakes outrage for interest – and fills your feed accordingly.