Stanford
University
  • Stanford Home
  • Maps & Directions
  • Search Stanford
  • Emergency Info
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Copyright
  • Trademarks
  • Non-Discrimination
  • Accessibility
© Stanford University.  Stanford, California 94305.
What the CHIPS and Science Act Means for Artificial Intelligence | Stanford HAI

Stay Up To Date

Get the latest news, advances in research, policy work, and education program updates from HAI in your inbox weekly.

Sign Up For Latest News

Navigate
  • About
  • Events
  • Careers
  • Search
Participate
  • Get Involved
  • Support HAI
  • Contact Us
Skip to content
  • About

    • About
    • People
    • Get Involved with HAI
    • Support HAI
    • Subscribe to Email
  • Research

    • Research
    • Fellowship Programs
    • Grants
    • Student Affinity Groups
    • Centers & Labs
    • Research Publications
    • Research Partners
  • Education

    • Education
    • Executive and Professional Education
    • Government and Policymakers
    • K-12
    • Stanford Students
  • Policy

    • Policy
    • Policy Publications
    • Policymaker Education
    • Student Opportunities
  • AI Index

    • AI Index
    • AI Index Report
    • Global Vibrancy Tool
    • People
  • News
  • Events
  • Industry
  • Centers & Labs
policyExplainer

What the CHIPS and Science Act Means for Artificial Intelligence

Date
August 01, 2022
Topics
Government, Public Administration
Read Paper
abstract

This explainer describes the CHIPS and Science ACT and its impact on AI.

Executive Summary

On July 27, 2022, Congress passed the CHIPS and Science Act (“CHIPS Act”) to spend $280 billion focused on boosting the United States’ scientific research and advanced semiconductor manufacturing capacity to boost U.S. competitiveness against China. Signed into law by President Biden on August 9, 2022, the bill allocates $52 billion in subsidies and tax credits for chip manufacturing companies, and $200 billion for research into AI, quantum computing, and robotics, among other areas. Much of this investment impacts AI—such as investments in developing semiconductors, which companies use to power research and development (R&D) for machine learning and AI—and some of the investment is focused on AI specifically.

This policy explainer describes the CHIPS Act and its impact on AI, including funding allocated to AI-related research and activities and provisions related to new AI capacity-building and development programs. The initiatives created and funded by the bill could help reshape the U.S. AI landscape for years to come.

Read Paper
Share
Link copied to clipboard!
Authors
  • Stanford HAI

Related Publications

Cleaning Up Policy Sludge: An AI Statutory Research System
Faiz Surani, Lindsey A. Gailmard, Allison Casasola, Varun Magesh, Emily J. Robitschek, Christine Tsang, Derek Ouyang, Daniel E. Ho
Quick ReadJun 18, 2025
Policy Brief

This brief introduces a novel AI tool that performs statutory surveys to help governments—such as the San Francisco City Attorney Office—identify policy sludge and accelerate legal reform.

Policy Brief

Cleaning Up Policy Sludge: An AI Statutory Research System

Faiz Surani, Lindsey A. Gailmard, Allison Casasola, Varun Magesh, Emily J. Robitschek, Christine Tsang, Derek Ouyang, Daniel E. Ho
Government, Public AdministrationQuick ReadJun 18

This brief introduces a novel AI tool that performs statutory surveys to help governments—such as the San Francisco City Attorney Office—identify policy sludge and accelerate legal reform.

Assessing the Implementation of Federal AI Leadership and Compliance Mandates
Jennifer Wang, Mirac Suzgun, Caroline Meinhardt, Daniel Zhang, Kazia Nowacki, Daniel E. Ho
Deep DiveJan 17, 2025
White Paper

This white paper assesses federal efforts to advance leadership on AI innovation and governance through recent executive actions and emphasizes the need for senior-level leadership to achieve a whole-of-government approach.

White Paper

Assessing the Implementation of Federal AI Leadership and Compliance Mandates

Jennifer Wang, Mirac Suzgun, Caroline Meinhardt, Daniel Zhang, Kazia Nowacki, Daniel E. Ho
Government, Public AdministrationRegulation, Policy, GovernanceDeep DiveJan 17

This white paper assesses federal efforts to advance leadership on AI innovation and governance through recent executive actions and emphasizes the need for senior-level leadership to achieve a whole-of-government approach.

Expanding Academia’s Role in Public Sector AI
Kevin Klyman, Aaron Bao, Caroline Meinhardt, Daniel Zhang, Elena Cryst, Russell Wald
Quick ReadDec 04, 2024
Issue Brief
Expanding Academias role in public sector ai

This brief analyzes the disparity between academia and industry in frontier AI research and presents policy recommendations for ensuring a stronger role for academia in public sector AI.

Issue Brief
Expanding Academias role in public sector ai

Expanding Academia’s Role in Public Sector AI

Kevin Klyman, Aaron Bao, Caroline Meinhardt, Daniel Zhang, Elena Cryst, Russell Wald
Government, Public AdministrationQuick ReadDec 04

This brief analyzes the disparity between academia and industry in frontier AI research and presents policy recommendations for ensuring a stronger role for academia in public sector AI.

Daniel E. Ho's Testimony Before the California Senate Governmental Organization Committee and the Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Subcommittee No. 4 on State Administration and General Government
Daniel E. Ho
Quick ReadFeb 21, 2024
Testimony

In this testimony presented in the California Senate Hearing “California at the Forefront: Steering AI Towards Ethical Horizons,” Daniel E. Ho offers three recommendations for how California should lead the nation in responsible AI innovation by nurturing and attracting technical talent into public service, democratizing access to computing and data resources, and addressing the information asymmetry about AI risks.

Testimony

Daniel E. Ho's Testimony Before the California Senate Governmental Organization Committee and the Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Subcommittee No. 4 on State Administration and General Government

Daniel E. Ho
Regulation, Policy, GovernanceGovernment, Public AdministrationQuick ReadFeb 21

In this testimony presented in the California Senate Hearing “California at the Forefront: Steering AI Towards Ethical Horizons,” Daniel E. Ho offers three recommendations for how California should lead the nation in responsible AI innovation by nurturing and attracting technical talent into public service, democratizing access to computing and data resources, and addressing the information asymmetry about AI risks.