Stanford
University
  • Stanford Home
  • Maps & Directions
  • Search Stanford
  • Emergency Info
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Copyright
  • Trademarks
  • Non-Discrimination
  • Accessibility
© Stanford University.  Stanford, California 94305.
Daniel E. Ho's Testimony Before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs | Stanford HAI

Stay Up To Date

Get the latest news, advances in research, policy work, and education program updates from HAI in your inbox weekly.

Sign Up For Latest News

Navigate
  • About
  • Events
  • AI Glossary
  • Careers
  • Search
Participate
  • Get Involved
  • Support HAI
  • Contact Us
Skip to content
  • About

    • About
    • People
    • Get Involved with HAI
    • Support HAI
    • Subscribe to Email
  • Research

    • Research
    • Research Programs
    • Grants
    • Marlowe (opens in new tab)
    • Student Affinity Groups
    • Centers & Labs
    • Research Publications
    • Research Partners
  • Education

    • Education
    • Executive and Professional Education
    • Government and Policymakers
    • K-12
    • Stanford Students
  • Policy

    • Policy
    • Policy Publications
    • Policymaker Education
    • Student Opportunities
  • AI Index

    • AI Index
    • AI Index Report
    • Global Vibrancy Tool
    • People
  • News
  • Events
  • Industry
  • Centers & Labs
policyTestimony

Daniel E. Ho's Testimony Before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

Date
May 16, 2023
Topics
Government, Public Administration
Privacy, Safety, Security
Read Paper
abstract

In this testimony presented to the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, Daniel E. Ho calls for Congress to seize AI’s potential to modernize federal programs and protect civil rights to maintain American leadership in AI innovation and responsible AI.

In collaboration with

Read Paper
Share
Link copied to clipboard!
Authors
  • Dan Ho headshot
    Daniel E. Ho
Related
  • Daniel E. Ho
    William Benjamin Scott and Luna M. Scott Professor of Law | Professor of Political Science | Professor of Computer Science (by courtesy) | Senior Fellow, Stanford Institute for Economic and Policy Research | Director of the Regulation, Evaluation, and Governance Lab (RegLab) | Associate Director, Stanford HAI
    Dan Ho headshot

Related Publications

Making Local Law Legible: LLM-Assisted Detection of Discrimination
Dan Bateyko, Yasmine Mabene, Derek Ouyang, Daniel E. Ho
Quick ReadSep 08, 2026
Policy Brief

This brief demonstrates the potential of LLM-assisted review to accelerate legal reform.

Policy Brief

Making Local Law Legible: LLM-Assisted Detection of Discrimination

Dan Bateyko, Yasmine Mabene, Derek Ouyang, Daniel E. Ho
Government, Public AdministrationEthics, Equity, InclusionQuick ReadSep 08

This brief demonstrates the potential of LLM-assisted review to accelerate legal reform.

Designing Loyalty: AI Agents and Conflicts of Interest
Ella Genasci Smith, Victor Y. Wu, Jennifer King
Quick ReadAug 25, 2026
Issue Brief

This brief examines the conflict-of-interest risks posed by AI agents and calls for imposing a duty of loyalty on developers and deployers.

Issue Brief

Designing Loyalty: AI Agents and Conflicts of Interest

Ella Genasci Smith, Victor Y. Wu, Jennifer King
Privacy, Safety, SecurityRegulation, Policy, GovernanceIndustry, InnovationQuick ReadAug 25

This brief examines the conflict-of-interest risks posed by AI agents and calls for imposing a duty of loyalty on developers and deployers.

Regulating Data Brokers in the Age of AI: A California Case Study
Anna-Maria Gueorguieva, Jennifer King, Apoorva Panidapu, Daniel E. Ho
Quick ReadAug 11, 2026
Policy Brief

This brief assesses data broker compliance with California privacy laws and calls for more stringent consumer protections.

Policy Brief

Regulating Data Brokers in the Age of AI: A California Case Study

Anna-Maria Gueorguieva, Jennifer King, Apoorva Panidapu, Daniel E. Ho
Privacy, Safety, SecurityRegulation, Policy, GovernanceQuick ReadAug 11

This brief assesses data broker compliance with California privacy laws and calls for more stringent consumer protections.

Data Privacy and Foundation Models: Can We Have Both?
Jennifer King, Tiffany Saade
Quick ReadApr 08, 2026
Issue Brief

This brief examines the privacy risks foundation models pose to individuals and society, and governance mechanisms needed to address them.

Issue Brief

Data Privacy and Foundation Models: Can We Have Both?

Jennifer King, Tiffany Saade
Privacy, Safety, SecurityFoundation ModelsRegulation, Policy, GovernanceQuick ReadApr 08

This brief examines the privacy risks foundation models pose to individuals and society, and governance mechanisms needed to address them.