Taming Silicon Valley: Peter Norvig in Conversation with Gary Marcus
Peter Norvig in Conversation with Gary Marcus
Abstract:
AI could make society or break it. It could revolutionize science, medicine, and technology, and deliver us a world of abundance and better health. Or it could lead to the downfall of democracy, an explosion in cybercrime, or possibly even worse. It’s also been wildly oversold.
In this seminar, moderator Peter Norvig and speaker Gary Marcus explain why current AI is both morally and technically inadequate, and what we need to do as a society – and as individual citizens – to get to AI that works for all of us.
Related Events
Caroline Meinhardt, Thomas Mullaney, Juan N. Pava, and Diyi Yang | How Can AI Support Language Digitization and Digital Inclusion?
What does digital inclusion look like in the age of AI? Over 6,000 of the world’s 7,000-plus living languages remain digitally disadvantaged.
What does digital inclusion look like in the age of AI? Over 6,000 of the world’s 7,000-plus living languages remain digitally disadvantaged.
AI+Science: Accelerating Discovery
AI+Science: Accelerating Discovery is an interdisciplinary conference bringing together researchers across physics, mathematics, chemistry, biology, neuroscience, and more to examine how AI is reshaping scientific discovery. Experts will separate hype from reality, spotlighting where AI is already enabling genuine breakthroughs and where its limits and risks remain.
AI+Science: Accelerating Discovery is an interdisciplinary conference bringing together researchers across physics, mathematics, chemistry, biology, neuroscience, and more to examine how AI is reshaping scientific discovery. Experts will separate hype from reality, spotlighting where AI is already enabling genuine breakthroughs and where its limits and risks remain.
Eyck Freymann | AI and Strategic Stability: A Framework for U.S.–China Technology Competition
Strategic stability exists when neither side thinks it can improve its strategic outcome by striking first.
Strategic stability exists when neither side thinks it can improve its strategic outcome by striking first.