Stanford
University
  • Stanford Home
  • Maps & Directions
  • Search Stanford
  • Emergency Info
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Copyright
  • Trademarks
  • Non-Discrimination
  • Accessibility
© Stanford University.  Stanford, California 94305.
Response to OSTP’s Request for Information on the Development of an AI Action Plan | Stanford HAI

Stay Up To Date

Get the latest news, advances in research, policy work, and education program updates from HAI in your inbox weekly.

Sign Up For Latest News

Skip to content
  • About

    • About
    • People
    • Get Involved with HAI
    • Support HAI
    • Subscribe to Email
  • Research

    • Research
    • Research Programs
    • Grants
    • Marlowe (opens in new tab)
    • Student Affinity Groups
    • Centers & Labs
    • Research Publications
    • Research Partners
  • Education

    • Education
    • Executive and Professional Education
    • Government and Policymakers
    • K-12
    • Stanford Students
  • Policy

    • Policy
    • Policy Publications
    • Policymaker Education
    • Student Opportunities
  • AI Index

    • AI Index
    • AI Index Report
    • Global Vibrancy Tool
    • People
  • News
  • Events
  • Industry
  • Centers & Labs
Navigate
  • About
  • Events
  • AI Glossary
  • Careers
  • Search
Participate
  • Get Involved
  • Support HAI
  • Contact Us
policyResponse to Request

Response to OSTP’s Request for Information on the Development of an AI Action Plan

Date
March 17, 2025
Topics
Regulation, Policy, Governance
Read Paper
abstract

Stanford scholars respond to a federal RFI on the development of an AI Action Plan, urging policymakers to promote open and scientific innovation, craft evidence-based AI policy, and empower government leaders.

In collaboration with

Executive Summary

In this response to a request for information issued by the National Science Foundation’s Networking and Information Technology Research and Development National Coordination Office (on behalf of the Office of Science and Technology Policy) regarding the development of an AI Action Plan, scholars from Stanford HAI, the Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM), and the Regulation, Evaluation, and Governance Lab (RegLab) urge policymakers to prioritize four areas of policy action: 

  1. Promote open innovation as a strategic advantage for U.S. competitiveness; 

  2. Maintain U.S. AI leadership by promoting scientific innovation; 

  3. Craft evidence-based AI policy that protects Americans without stifling innovation; 

  4. Empower government leaders with resources and technical expertise to ensure a “whole-of-government” approach to AI governance.

Read Paper
Share
Link copied to clipboard!
Authors
  • headshot
    Caroline Meinhardt
  • Daniel Zhang
    Daniel Zhang
  • Rishi Bommasani
    Rishi Bommasani
  • Jennifer King
    Jennifer King
  • Russell Wald headshot
    Russell Wald
  • Percy Liang
    Percy Liang
  • Dan Ho headshot
    Daniel E. Ho
Related
  • Inside Trump’s Ambitious AI Action Plan
    Caroline Meinhardt, Daniel Zhang, Jennifer King, Andy Haupt, Elena Cryst
    Jul 24
    news
    Donald Trump

    The White House favors market-driven growth and light governance, signaling a departure from the previous administration.

Related Publications

Response to FDA’s Request for Feedback on Considerations for the Regulation of GenAI-Enabled Medical Devices
Roxana Daneshjou, Debadutta (Dev) Dash, Diliana Funtarova, Curtis Langlotz, Kara Liu, David Magnus, Josh Makower, Nicole Martinez-Martin, Caroline Meinhardt, Michelle Mello, Jared Moore, Sandra Waugh Ruggles, Kevin Schulman, Nigam Shah, Artem Trotsyuk, Caroline Yee
Quick ReadOct 19, 2026
Response to Request

Stanford scholars respond to a federal request for feedback, offering policy recommendations for the regulation of generative AI-enabled medical devices.

Response to Request

Response to FDA’s Request for Feedback on Considerations for the Regulation of GenAI-Enabled Medical Devices

Roxana Daneshjou, Debadutta (Dev) Dash, Diliana Funtarova, Curtis Langlotz, Kara Liu, David Magnus, Josh Makower, Nicole Martinez-Martin, Caroline Meinhardt, Michelle Mello, Jared Moore, Sandra Waugh Ruggles, Kevin Schulman, Nigam Shah, Artem Trotsyuk, Caroline Yee
HealthcareRegulation, Policy, GovernanceGenerative AIQuick ReadOct 19

Stanford scholars respond to a federal request for feedback, offering policy recommendations for the regulation of generative AI-enabled medical devices.

Implementing the Transparency in Frontier AI Act Report for the California Department of Technology Multistakeholder Workshops
Rob Reich, Deirdre Mulligan
Quick ReadSep 25, 2026
Response to Request

In this paper, HAI Associate Director and Senior Fellow Rob Reich and UC Berkeley School of Information Professor Deirdre K. Mulligan provide concrete recommendations to the California Department of Technology on the implementation of its frontier AI transparency requirements. 

Response to Request

Implementing the Transparency in Frontier AI Act Report for the California Department of Technology Multistakeholder Workshops

Rob Reich, Deirdre Mulligan
Regulation, Policy, GovernancePrivacy, Safety, SecurityFoundation ModelsQuick ReadSep 25

In this paper, HAI Associate Director and Senior Fellow Rob Reich and UC Berkeley School of Information Professor Deirdre K. Mulligan provide concrete recommendations to the California Department of Technology on the implementation of its frontier AI transparency requirements. 

Designing Loyalty: AI Agents and Conflicts of Interest
Ella Genasci Smith, Victor Y. Wu, Jennifer King
Quick ReadAug 25, 2026
Issue Brief

This brief examines the conflict-of-interest risks posed by AI agents and calls for imposing a duty of loyalty on developers and deployers.

Issue Brief

Designing Loyalty: AI Agents and Conflicts of Interest

Ella Genasci Smith, Victor Y. Wu, Jennifer King
Privacy, Safety, SecurityRegulation, Policy, GovernanceIndustry, InnovationQuick ReadAug 25

This brief examines the conflict-of-interest risks posed by AI agents and calls for imposing a duty of loyalty on developers and deployers.

Regulating Data Brokers in the Age of AI: A California Case Study
Anna-Maria Gueorguieva, Jennifer King, Apoorva Panidapu, Daniel E. Ho
Quick ReadAug 11, 2026
Policy Brief

This brief assesses data broker compliance with California privacy laws and calls for more stringent consumer protections.

Policy Brief

Regulating Data Brokers in the Age of AI: A California Case Study

Anna-Maria Gueorguieva, Jennifer King, Apoorva Panidapu, Daniel E. Ho
Privacy, Safety, SecurityRegulation, Policy, GovernanceQuick ReadAug 11

This brief assesses data broker compliance with California privacy laws and calls for more stringent consumer protections.