Stanford
University
  • Stanford Home
  • Maps & Directions
  • Search Stanford
  • Emergency Info
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Copyright
  • Trademarks
  • Non-Discrimination
  • Accessibility
© Stanford University.  Stanford, California 94305.
Can Democracy Survive in a Digital World? | Stanford HAI
Skip to content
  • About

    • About
    • People
    • Get Involved with HAI
    • Support HAI
    • Subscribe to Email
  • Research

    • Research
    • Fellowship Programs
    • Grants
    • Student Affinity Groups
    • Centers & Labs
    • Research Publications
    • Research Partners
  • Education

    • Education
    • Executive and Professional Education
    • Government and Policymakers
    • K-12
    • Stanford Students
  • Policy

    • Policy
    • Policy Publications
    • Policymaker Education
    • Student Opportunities
  • AI Index

    • AI Index
    • AI Index Report
    • Global Vibrancy Tool
    • People
  • News
  • Events
  • Industry
  • Centers & Labs
Navigate
  • About
  • Events
  • AI Glossary
  • Careers
  • Search
Participate
  • Get Involved
  • Support HAI
  • Contact Us

Stay Up To Date

Get the latest news, advances in research, policy work, and education program updates from HAI in your inbox weekly.

Sign Up For Latest News

news

Can Democracy Survive in a Digital World?

Date
October 01, 2020
Topics
Privacy, Safety, Security
Stocksy/Jess Lewis

Marietje Schaake, a former member of the European Parliament, explains the biggest threats to democracy and ways to fight back. 

Marietje Schaake was a Member of the European Parliament from 2009 to 2019 and now serves as the international policy director at Stanford University’s Cyber Policy Center and international policy fellow at Stanford’s Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence.

As she has watched democracy evolve in the age of instantaneous global communication and hyperconnected social media, she has grown concerned about the resilience of democracy as technology disrupts the status quo.

While the technologies — and the often-unregulated companies who created them — claim to be well-meaning, she says democracy is under attack from propagandists and bad actors using these transformative tools in troubling ways. The business models based on surveillance and advertising were never designed with preserving democracy in mind. We now find ourselves at a decisive moment for the future of elective government, she says. America and other democratic nations can expose the meddlers and their techniques or succumb to their approaches. The solutions, she says, begin at the grassroots and with the tech companies. We need real-time and independent monitoring and research to better expose manipulations and to allow for evidence-based policy making.

Watch Stanford Engineering’s The Future of Everything podcast, hosted by HAI associate director Russ Altman, for an insider’s sobering look at democracy in the digital age. 

 

Stanford HAI's mission is to advance AI research, education, policy and practice to improve the human condition. Learn more. 

Stocksy/Jess Lewis
Share
Link copied to clipboard!
Contributor(s)
Stanford Engineering
Related
  • HAI Fellow Colin Garvey: A Zen Buddhist Monk’s Approach to Democratizing AI
    Katharine Miller
    May 28
    news

    The social scientist discusses AI’s problematic narrative and what we stand to lose in a China/U.S. AI arms race.

Related News

Stanford Study Exposes Major Flaw in AI Mental Health Safety Testing
Andrew Myers
Jul 13, 2026
News
mental health ai illustration head with binary code

With increased use of chatbots in mental health contexts, AI developers now rely on human experts to evaluate AI’s responses for “safety” – but experts rarely agree on what’s safe.

News
mental health ai illustration head with binary code

Stanford Study Exposes Major Flaw in AI Mental Health Safety Testing

Andrew Myers
HealthcareGenerative AIPrivacy, Safety, SecurityJul 13

With increased use of chatbots in mental health contexts, AI developers now rely on human experts to evaluate AI’s responses for “safety” – but experts rarely agree on what’s safe.

HAI Student Affinity Groups Take On Society’s Emerging Questions
Madeleine Wright
Jun 26, 2026
News

Stanford students across disciplines are teaming up to tackle society’s pressing questions in the age of AI.

News

HAI Student Affinity Groups Take On Society’s Emerging Questions

Madeleine Wright
Arts, HumanitiesGenerative AIEthics, Equity, InclusionPrivacy, Safety, SecurityJun 26

Stanford students across disciplines are teaming up to tackle society’s pressing questions in the age of AI.

What Is AI Sovereignty And Why Are Companies Chasing After It?
IT Brew
Apr 27, 2026
Media Mention

"Countries pursue AI sovereignty with four main objectives in mind: cultural autonomy, national security, economic competitiveness, and regulatory oversight," says Juan N. Pava, Stanford HAI Research Fellow.

Media Mention
Your browser does not support the video tag.

What Is AI Sovereignty And Why Are Companies Chasing After It?

IT Brew
DemocracyInternational Affairs, International Security, International DevelopmentRegulation, Policy, GovernancePrivacy, Safety, SecurityApr 27

"Countries pursue AI sovereignty with four main objectives in mind: cultural autonomy, national security, economic competitiveness, and regulatory oversight," says Juan N. Pava, Stanford HAI Research Fellow.