Can Democracy Survive in a Digital World?
Marietje Schaake, a former member of the European Parliament, explains the biggest threats to democracy and ways to fight back.
Marietje Schaake was a Member of the European Parliament from 2009 to 2019 and now serves as the international policy director at Stanford University’s Cyber Policy Center and international policy fellow at Stanford’s Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence.
As she has watched democracy evolve in the age of instantaneous global communication and hyperconnected social media, she has grown concerned about the resilience of democracy as technology disrupts the status quo.
While the technologies — and the often-unregulated companies who created them — claim to be well-meaning, she says democracy is under attack from propagandists and bad actors using these transformative tools in troubling ways. The business models based on surveillance and advertising were never designed with preserving democracy in mind. We now find ourselves at a decisive moment for the future of elective government, she says. America and other democratic nations can expose the meddlers and their techniques or succumb to their approaches. The solutions, she says, begin at the grassroots and with the tech companies. We need real-time and independent monitoring and research to better expose manipulations and to allow for evidence-based policy making.
Watch Stanford Engineering’s The Future of Everything podcast, hosted by HAI associate director Russ Altman, for an insider’s sobering look at democracy in the digital age.
Stanford HAI's mission is to advance AI research, education, policy and practice to improve the human condition. Learn more.
Related News
Benchmarks — the standardized tests that rank AI models on safety, bias, and reasoning — drive markets and shape regulation. New Stanford research finds they often don't measure what they claim to.
Benchmarks — the standardized tests that rank AI models on safety, bias, and reasoning — drive markets and shape regulation. New Stanford research finds they often don't measure what they claim to.
In a new series called Prompt Response, Stanford’s Surya Ganguli, Diyi Yang and Rob Reich examined emergent agent behavior, recursive self-improvement, independent evaluation and whether a kill switch can make advanced AI safer.
In a new series called Prompt Response, Stanford’s Surya Ganguli, Diyi Yang and Rob Reich examined emergent agent behavior, recursive self-improvement, independent evaluation and whether a kill switch can make advanced AI safer.
HAI Policy Fellow Jennifer King advises caution surrounding one's person security when using AI, citing her research on AI privacy and insights on users’ tendency to disclose personal information to chatbots due to their conversational nature, the lack of transparency in how companies use chatbot conversations for training, and the evolving legal landscape around this data.
HAI Policy Fellow Jennifer King advises caution surrounding one's person security when using AI, citing her research on AI privacy and insights on users’ tendency to disclose personal information to chatbots due to their conversational nature, the lack of transparency in how companies use chatbot conversations for training, and the evolving legal landscape around this data.