Daniel E. Ho's Testimony Before the House Oversight and Accountability Cybersecurity, Information Technology, and Government Innovation Subcommittee
In this testimony presented to the U.S. House Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Information Technology, and Government Innovation, Daniel E. Ho recommends six AI governance actions including boosting AI talent, establishing a mandated adverse event reporting system, and funding public AI research initiatives.
In collaboration with
Related Publications
Response to FDA’s Request for Feedback on Considerations for the Regulation of GenAI-Enabled Medical Devices
Stanford scholars respond to a federal request for feedback, offering policy recommendations for the regulation of generative AI-enabled medical devices.
Stanford scholars respond to a federal request for feedback, offering policy recommendations for the regulation of generative AI-enabled medical devices.
Implementing the Transparency in Frontier AI Act Report for the California Department of Technology Multistakeholder Workshops
In this paper, HAI Associate Director and Senior Fellow Rob Reich and UC Berkeley School of Information Professor Deirdre K. Mulligan provide concrete recommendations to the California Department of Technology on the implementation of its frontier AI transparency requirements.
In this paper, HAI Associate Director and Senior Fellow Rob Reich and UC Berkeley School of Information Professor Deirdre K. Mulligan provide concrete recommendations to the California Department of Technology on the implementation of its frontier AI transparency requirements.
Making Local Law Legible: LLM-Assisted Detection of Discrimination
This brief demonstrates the potential of LLM-assisted review to accelerate legal reform.
This brief demonstrates the potential of LLM-assisted review to accelerate legal reform.
Designing Loyalty: AI Agents and Conflicts of Interest
This brief examines the conflict-of-interest risks posed by AI agents and calls for imposing a duty of loyalty on developers and deployers.
This brief examines the conflict-of-interest risks posed by AI agents and calls for imposing a duty of loyalty on developers and deployers.