Stanford HAI Artificial Intelligence Bill of Rights | Stanford HAI
Stanford
University
  • Stanford Home
  • Maps & Directions
  • Search Stanford
  • Emergency Info
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Copyright
  • Trademarks
  • Non-Discrimination
  • Accessibility
© Stanford University.  Stanford, California 94305.
Skip to content
  • About

    • About
    • People
    • Get Involved with HAI
    • Support HAI
    • Subscribe to Email
  • Research

    • Research
    • Fellowship Programs
    • Grants
    • Student Affinity Groups
    • Centers & Labs
    • Research Publications
    • Research Partners
  • Education

    • Education
    • Executive and Professional Education
    • Government and Policymakers
    • K-12
    • Stanford Students
  • Policy

    • Policy
    • Policy Publications
    • Policymaker Education
    • Student Opportunities
  • AI Index

    • AI Index
    • AI Index Report
    • Global Vibrancy Tool
    • People
  • News
  • Events
  • Industry
  • Centers & Labs
Navigate
  • About
  • Events
  • Careers
  • Search
Participate
  • Get Involved
  • Support HAI
  • Contact Us

Stay Up To Date

Get the latest news, advances in research, policy work, and education program updates from HAI in your inbox weekly.

Sign Up For Latest News

policyResponse to Request

Stanford HAI Artificial Intelligence Bill of Rights

Date
January 01, 2022
Topics
Regulation, Policy, Governance
Ethics, Equity, Inclusion
Read Paper
abstract

Stanford scholars respond to a federal RFI regarding public and private sector uses of biometric technologies, proposing six principles for the responsible use of biometrics and AI.

Executive Summary

In this response to a request for information by the White House Office of Science and Technology (OSTP) on public and private sector uses of biometric technologies, Stanford HAI scholars examine the uses of biometric technologies while also taking the implications of broader AI technologies into consideration. They argue that biometrics and AI are uniquely intertwined and that we must understand both the full impacts of AI and how the biometric paradigm disproportionately affects marginalized groups and exacerbates inequities. They propose a set of six principles:

  1. Ensuring AI-powered biometric systems are developed and deployed in a manner that supports fundamental democratic values with respect to the rule of law, basic civil liberties, and universal human rights.

  2. Safeguarding fairness and rights to nondiscrimination.

  3. Ensuring transparency and explainability during development and due process rights in application.

  4. Strengthening participation of civil society organizations in important AI use and governance conversations.

  5. Embedding accountability measures into system design.

  6. Enhancing citizen education in relation to AI and its impacts.

Read Paper
Share
Link copied to clipboard!
Authors
  • Michele Elam headshot
    Michele Elam
  • Rob Reich
    Rob Reich

Related Publications

How Can AI Support Language Digitization and Digital Inclusion?
Juan Pava, Thomas S. Mullaney, Caroline Meinhardt, Audrey Gao, Diyi Yang
Deep DiveFeb 26, 2026
White Paper

This white paper analyzes the varying ways AI tools can advance language digitization work, and provides recommendations for responsibly realizing the potential of AI in supporting the digital inclusion of digitally disadvantaged languages.

White Paper

How Can AI Support Language Digitization and Digital Inclusion?

Juan Pava, Thomas S. Mullaney, Caroline Meinhardt, Audrey Gao, Diyi Yang
Ethics, Equity, InclusionInternational Affairs, International Security, International DevelopmentNatural Language ProcessingDeep DiveFeb 26

This white paper analyzes the varying ways AI tools can advance language digitization work, and provides recommendations for responsibly realizing the potential of AI in supporting the digital inclusion of digitally disadvantaged languages.

Toward Responsible AI in Health Insurance Decision-Making
Michelle Mello, Artem Trotsyuk, Abdoul Jalil Djiberou Mahamadou, Danton Char
Quick ReadFeb 10, 2026
Policy Brief

This brief proposes governance mechanisms for the growing use of AI in health insurance utilization review.

Policy Brief

Toward Responsible AI in Health Insurance Decision-Making

Michelle Mello, Artem Trotsyuk, Abdoul Jalil Djiberou Mahamadou, Danton Char
HealthcareRegulation, Policy, GovernanceQuick ReadFeb 10

This brief proposes governance mechanisms for the growing use of AI in health insurance utilization review.

Response to OSTP's Request for Information on Accelerating the American Scientific Enterprise
Rishi Bommasani, John Etchemendy, Surya Ganguli, Daniel E. Ho, Guido Imbens, James Landay, Fei-Fei Li, Russell Wald
Quick ReadDec 26, 2025
Response to Request

Stanford scholars respond to a federal RFI on scientific discovery, calling for the government to support a new “team science” academic research model for AI-enabled discovery.

Response to Request

Response to OSTP's Request for Information on Accelerating the American Scientific Enterprise

Rishi Bommasani, John Etchemendy, Surya Ganguli, Daniel E. Ho, Guido Imbens, James Landay, Fei-Fei Li, Russell Wald
Sciences (Social, Health, Biological, Physical)Regulation, Policy, GovernanceQuick ReadDec 26

Stanford scholars respond to a federal RFI on scientific discovery, calling for the government to support a new “team science” academic research model for AI-enabled discovery.

Response to FDA's Request for Comment on AI-Enabled Medical Devices
Desmond C. Ong, Jared Moore, Nicole Martinez-Martin, Caroline Meinhardt, Eric Lin, William Agnew
Quick ReadDec 02, 2025
Response to Request

Stanford scholars respond to a federal RFC on evaluating AI-enabled medical devices, recommending policy interventions to help mitigate the harms of AI-powered chatbots used as therapists.

Response to Request

Response to FDA's Request for Comment on AI-Enabled Medical Devices

Desmond C. Ong, Jared Moore, Nicole Martinez-Martin, Caroline Meinhardt, Eric Lin, William Agnew
HealthcareRegulation, Policy, GovernanceQuick ReadDec 02

Stanford scholars respond to a federal RFC on evaluating AI-enabled medical devices, recommending policy interventions to help mitigate the harms of AI-powered chatbots used as therapists.