Stanford
University
  • Stanford Home
  • Maps & Directions
  • Search Stanford
  • Emergency Info
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Copyright
  • Trademarks
  • Non-Discrimination
  • Accessibility
© Stanford University.  Stanford, California 94305.
How Can AI Support Language Digitization and Digital Inclusion? | Stanford HAI
Skip to content
  • About

    • About
    • People
    • Get Involved with HAI
    • Support HAI
    • Subscribe to Email
  • Research

    • Research
    • Fellowship Programs
    • Grants
    • Student Affinity Groups
    • Centers & Labs
    • Research Publications
    • Research Partners
  • Education

    • Education
    • Executive and Professional Education
    • Government and Policymakers
    • K-12
    • Stanford Students
  • Policy

    • Policy
    • Policy Publications
    • Policymaker Education
    • Student Opportunities
  • AI Index

    • AI Index
    • AI Index Report
    • Global Vibrancy Tool
    • People
  • News
  • Events
  • Industry
  • Centers & Labs
Navigate
  • About
  • Events
  • Careers
  • Search
Participate
  • Get Involved
  • Support HAI
  • Contact Us

Stay Up To Date

Get the latest news, advances in research, policy work, and education program updates from HAI in your inbox weekly.

Sign Up For Latest News

policyWhite Paper

How Can AI Support Language Digitization and Digital Inclusion?

Date
February 26, 2026
Topics
Ethics, Equity, Inclusion
International Affairs, International Security, International Development
Natural Language Processing
Read Paper
abstract

This white paper analyzes the varying ways AI tools can advance language digitization work, and provides recommendations for responsibly realizing the potential of AI in supporting the digital inclusion of digitally disadvantaged languages.

In collaboration with

Executive Summary

  • In the wake of rapid AI development, attention is increasingly being drawn to the fact that most AI systems fail to serve most of the world’s linguistic communities. Data scarcity is often highlighted as a key reason, yet there are much more basic digital foundations that are prerequisites for building AI training datasets. 

  • Over 6,000 of the world’s 7,000-plus living languages remain digitally disadvantaged, meaning that they are unsupported across mainstream devices, operating systems, browsers, and applications. Language communities excluded from digital systems can only participate minimally in a world increasingly mediated by technology and are at the same time unable to generate enough data needed to be represented in AI. 

  • Empowering digitally disadvantaged language communities to participate in today’s digital world requires holistic progress on a set of foundational language tools (from script encoding to keyboard layouts) and supporting language tools (from grammar checkers to accessibility features). 

  • A global network of language practitioners, scholars, and grassroots groups have been working tirelessly to create and sustain these language tools. Yet progress is often slow and uneven amid chronic underfunding and a lack of coordination.

  • AI has the potential to scale and accelerate language digitization. In recent years, scholars have begun leveraging AI — and especially natural language processing tools — to sidestep major bottlenecks in the field:

    • In the early stages of language digitization, AI tools such as grapheme-to-phoneme systems, morphological analyzers, optical character recognition systems, and image generation models can assist with script development and foundational language infrastructure tooling.

    • Once a language can effectively be rendered on devices, AI tools such as language identification models, optical character recognition systems, and automatic speech recognition systems can support language transcription and broader documentation and data collection processes.

    • In the final stages of language digitization, AI tools such as machine translation, grammar- and spell-checking systems, text-to-speech systems, forced alignment tools, and large language models are increasingly the foundation for supporting digital tools that help ensure true digital inclusion.

  • It is important to note that not all language communities may choose to develop a writing system for their language. Technical approaches are emerging that enable the creation and use of digital tools for spoken-only languages.

  • While all these nascent efforts are promising, AI alone cannot address the field’s more fundamental research problems, workflow bottlenecks, and adoption challenges. Language digitization is also an inherently community-centric process that requires a deeply sensitive cultural and linguistic understanding. Much of the work in this field should thus continue to be driven by the language communities themselves, with AI as an accompanying tool.

  • Additional work, time, and resources need to be invested in harnessing AI for language digitization in a way that centers communities and their individual needs and contexts. We outline detailed recommendations for different stakeholders to work together to advance language digitization and digital inclusion in the age of AI, including:

    • Building trust and empowering communities by fostering community-engaged convenings and collaborations, and building community-driven benchmarks and standards for digital language tools.

    • Strengthening research foundations by creating reliable resources to track progress on digitally disadvantaged languages, investing in, expanding, and evaluating effective AI tools for language digitization, and creating forums for interdisciplinary exchanges.

    • Improving workflows by moving to parallel workflows for language digitization and leveraging AI for organizational improvements.

    • Forming coalitions by implementing mechanisms to reform incentive structures surrounding language tool adoption and strengthening storytelling for general audiences.

    • Ensuring cultural sustainability by empowering culturally aware AI development, promoting contextualized adoption, and impact assessment.

Read Paper


Visualizing the potential role of AI in language digitization

A flow diagram titled “The potential role of AI tools in language digitization processes.” This diagram illustrates a staged pathway for language digitization and maps different artificial intelligence tools to specific phases within that process. The layout progresses horizontally from left to right, beginning with languages that exist only in oral form and culminating in languages that have advanced digital capabilities. Across the top of the diagram, a banner emphasizes that all digital inclusion pathways and tools should be community-centered, accessible, and respectful of data rights. Beneath the main progression, the diagram indicates that community deliberation and choice must also underpin each stage of the digitization process.  The pathway begins with a language that is oral only. The next stage involves script development, including the creation of a new writing system and the standardization of orthography. Once a language is written, activities include collecting and analyzing written data. The process then moves to the creation of supporting digital infrastructure, which includes encoding the script into Unicode, developing keyboards, creating fonts and typefaces, designing user interfaces, and adding the language to global digital registries. After this infrastructure is in place, the language becomes digitized through the collection of digitized audio and text data. From there, the language may gain basic digital affordances, such as machine translation, indexing and search functions, and spell checking. In the final stage, the language attains advanced digital affordances, including voice assistants, e-learning tools, and other natural language processing applications. Positioned beneath these stages are labeled boxes identifying AI tools and describing their potential use cases. Arrows connect each tool to the stages it may support. Grapheme-to-phoneme models are shown as helping identify and resolve inconsistencies in orthography during script standardization. Morphological analyzers support analysis of word structure and linguistic variation. Image-to-text models, such as optical character recognition systems, assist in differentiating glyphs and reducing transcription time. Image generation models are shown as aiding font design by extrapolating full character sets. Language identification models support the sorting and classification of multilingual audio and text. Speech-to-text models, also known as automatic speech recognition systems, accelerate audio transcription. Text-to-speech models generate natural-sounding speech, including for accessibility purposes. Speech-to-speech translation models enable direct translation of spoken language. Forced alignment models support read-along materials by aligning audio with text. Traditional machine translation models expand datasets and enable cross-language access. Large language models are shown as assisting in annotating and expanding datasets for downstream applications.

Download high resolution image

This diagram depicts some of the most promising AI tools and techniques highlighted in the white paper that are currently being applied to ongoing efforts to bring digitally disadvantaged languages into the digital realm. The tools shown here — along a staged pathway for language digitization, from digitally disadvantaged, oral-only languages to languages with advanced digital affordances — are illustrative rather than exhaustive and represent possible applications that may support, but not replace, community-led language planning and governance decisions. 

Much of this work rests on painstaking, often unglamorous groundwork. Real-world digitization is nonlinear, iterative, and full of unforeseen complications. As such, the figure offers a simplified vantage point on a far messier reality, highlighting the breadth of areas where AI tools can improve or scale workflows.

Read Paper
Share
Link copied to clipboard!
Authors
  • Juan N. Pava
    Juan N. Pava
  • Thomas S. Mullaney
    Thomas S. Mullaney
  • headshot
    Caroline Meinhardt
  • Audrey Gao
    Audrey Gao
  • Diyi Yang
    Diyi Yang
Related
  • Mind the (Language) Gap: Mapping the Challenges of LLM Development in Low-Resource Language Contexts
    Juan N. Pava, Caroline Meinhardt, Haifa Badi Uz Zaman, Toni Friedman, Sang T. Truong, Daniel Zhang, Elena Cryst, Vukosi Marivate, Sanmi Koyejo
    Deep DiveApr 22
    whitepaper

    This white paper maps the LLM development landscape for low-resource languages, highlighting challenges, trade-offs, and strategies to increase investment; prioritize cross-disciplinary, community-driven development; and ensure fair data ownership.

  • Caroline Meinhardt, Thomas Mullaney, Juan N. Pava, and Diyi Yang | How Can AI Support Language Digitization and Digital Inclusion?
    seminarApr 15, 202612:00 PM - 1:15 PM
    April
    15
    2026

    What does digital inclusion look like in the age of AI? Over 6,000 of the world’s 7,000-plus living languages remain digitally disadvantaged.

Related Publications

Beyond DeepSeek: China's Diverse Open-Weight AI Ecosystem and Its Policy Implications
Caroline Meinhardt, Sabina Nong, Graham Webster, Tatsunori Hashimoto, Christopher Manning
Deep DiveDec 16, 2025
Issue Brief

Almost one year after the “DeepSeek moment,” this brief analyzes China’s diverse open-model ecosystem and examines the policy implications of their widespread global diffusion.

Issue Brief

Beyond DeepSeek: China's Diverse Open-Weight AI Ecosystem and Its Policy Implications

Caroline Meinhardt, Sabina Nong, Graham Webster, Tatsunori Hashimoto, Christopher Manning
Foundation ModelsInternational Affairs, International Security, International DevelopmentDeep DiveDec 16

Almost one year after the “DeepSeek moment,” this brief analyzes China’s diverse open-model ecosystem and examines the policy implications of their widespread global diffusion.

Moving Beyond the Term "Global South" in AI Ethics and Policy
Evani Radiya-Dixit, Angèle Christin
Quick ReadNov 19, 2025
Issue Brief

This brief examines the limitations of the term "Global South" in AI ethics and policy, and highlights the importance of grounding such work in specific regions and power structures.

Issue Brief

Moving Beyond the Term "Global South" in AI Ethics and Policy

Evani Radiya-Dixit, Angèle Christin
Ethics, Equity, InclusionInternational Affairs, International Security, International DevelopmentQuick ReadNov 19

This brief examines the limitations of the term "Global South" in AI ethics and policy, and highlights the importance of grounding such work in specific regions and power structures.

Yejin Choi’s Briefing to the United Nations Security Council
Yejin Choi
Quick ReadSep 24, 2025
Testimony

In this address, presented to the United Nations Security Council meeting on "Maintenance of International Peace and Security," Yejin Choi calls on the global scientific and policy communities to expand the AI frontier for all by pursuing intelligence that is not only powerful, but also accessible, robust, and efficient. She stresses the need to rethink our dependence on massive-scale data and computing resources from the outset, and design methods that do more with less — by building AI that is smaller and serves all communities.

Testimony

Yejin Choi’s Briefing to the United Nations Security Council

Yejin Choi
International Affairs, International Security, International DevelopmentQuick ReadSep 24

In this address, presented to the United Nations Security Council meeting on "Maintenance of International Peace and Security," Yejin Choi calls on the global scientific and policy communities to expand the AI frontier for all by pursuing intelligence that is not only powerful, but also accessible, robust, and efficient. She stresses the need to rethink our dependence on massive-scale data and computing resources from the outset, and design methods that do more with less — by building AI that is smaller and serves all communities.

Increasing Fairness in Medicare Payment Algorithms
Marissa Reitsma, Thomas G. McGuire, Sherri Rose
Quick ReadSep 01, 2025
Policy Brief

This brief introduces two algorithms that can promote fairer Medicare Advantage spending for minority populations.

Policy Brief

Increasing Fairness in Medicare Payment Algorithms

Marissa Reitsma, Thomas G. McGuire, Sherri Rose
Ethics, Equity, InclusionHealthcareQuick ReadSep 01

This brief introduces two algorithms that can promote fairer Medicare Advantage spending for minority populations.