All Work Published on Privacy, Safety, Security
The Privacy-Bias Trade-Off
This brief examines the “regulatory misalignment” of existing regulatory proposals for AI and urges policymakers to first consider feasibility, trade-offs, and unintended consequences before rushing into regulation.
This brief examines the “regulatory misalignment” of existing regulatory proposals for AI and urges policymakers to first consider feasibility, trade-offs, and unintended consequences before rushing into regulation.
The Evolution of Safety: Stanford’s Mykel Kochenderfer Explores Responsible AI in High-Stakes Environments
As AI technologies rapidly evolve, Professor Kochenderfer leads the charge in developing effective validation mechanisms to ensure safety in autonomous systems like vehicles and drones.
As AI technologies rapidly evolve, Professor Kochenderfer leads the charge in developing effective validation mechanisms to ensure safety in autonomous systems like vehicles and drones.
Stanford scholars respond to a federal RFC on AI accountability policy issued by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA).
Stanford scholars respond to a federal RFC on AI accountability policy issued by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA).
Pointing to "white-hat" hacking, AI policy experts recommend a new system of third-party reporting and tracking of AI’s flaws.
Pointing to "white-hat" hacking, AI policy experts recommend a new system of third-party reporting and tracking of AI’s flaws.
Daniel E. Ho's Testimony Before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
In this testimony presented to the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, Daniel E. Ho calls for Congress to seize AI’s potential to modernize federal programs and protect civil rights to maintain American leadership in AI innovation and responsible AI.
In this testimony presented to the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, Daniel E. Ho calls for Congress to seize AI’s potential to modernize federal programs and protect civil rights to maintain American leadership in AI innovation and responsible AI.
After 23andMe announced that it’s headed to bankruptcy court, it’s unclear what happens to the mass of sensitive genetic data that it holds. Jen King, Policy Fellow at HAI comments on where this data could end up and be used for.
After 23andMe announced that it’s headed to bankruptcy court, it’s unclear what happens to the mass of sensitive genetic data that it holds. Jen King, Policy Fellow at HAI comments on where this data could end up and be used for.