Stanford
University
  • Stanford Home
  • Maps & Directions
  • Search Stanford
  • Emergency Info
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Copyright
  • Trademarks
  • Non-Discrimination
  • Accessibility
© Stanford University.  Stanford, California 94305.
Response to FTC's Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Commercial Surveillance and Data Security | Stanford HAI
Skip to content
  • About

    • About
    • People
    • Get Involved with HAI
    • Support HAI
    • Subscribe to Email
  • Research

    • Research
    • Fellowship Programs
    • Grants
    • Student Affinity Groups
    • Centers & Labs
    • Research Publications
    • Research Partners
  • Education

    • Education
    • Executive and Professional Education
    • Government and Policymakers
    • K-12
    • Stanford Students
  • Policy

    • Policy
    • Policy Publications
    • Policymaker Education
    • Student Opportunities
  • AI Index

    • AI Index
    • AI Index Report
    • Global Vibrancy Tool
    • People
  • News
  • Events
  • Industry
  • Centers & Labs
Navigate
  • About
  • Events
  • AI Glossary
  • Careers
  • Search
Participate
  • Get Involved
  • Support HAI
  • Contact Us

Stay Up To Date

Get the latest news, advances in research, policy work, and education program updates from HAI in your inbox weekly.

Sign Up For Latest News

policyResponse to Request

Response to FTC's Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Commercial Surveillance and Data Security

Date
November 21, 2022
Topics
Privacy, Safety, Security
Regulation, Policy, Governance
Read Paper
abstract

Stanford scholars respond to a federal RFC on commercial surveillance and data security, focusing on the intersection of automated decision-making and information privacy.

Executive Summary

In this response to the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) advance notice on proposed rulemaking on commercial surveillance and data security, Stanford HAI scholars challenge the assumption that data minimization and purpose limitation principles are inherently barriers to innovation. They argue that companies must be held to high standards when building automated decision-making systems based on personal data and call for a shift away from the current data acquisition landscape, where companies are the primary stewards of consumers’ personal data. Instead, they advocate for data intermediaries and investment in public data infrastructure for automated decision-making that is more resilient and less dependent on private actors.

Read Paper
Share
Link copied to clipboard!
Authors
  • Jennifer King
    Jennifer King
  • headshot
    Caroline Meinhardt
  • Abel Ribbink
    Abel Ribbink
  • Pete Warden
    Pete Warden
  • Daniel Zhang
    Daniel Zhang
  • James Zou
    James Zou

Related Publications

Designing Loyalty: AI Agents and Conflicts of Interest
Ella Genasci Smith, Victor Y. Wu, Jennifer King
Quick ReadAug 25, 2026
Issue Brief

This brief examines the conflict-of-interest risks posed by AI agents and calls for imposing a duty of loyalty on developers and deployers.

Issue Brief

Designing Loyalty: AI Agents and Conflicts of Interest

Ella Genasci Smith, Victor Y. Wu, Jennifer King
Privacy, Safety, SecurityRegulation, Policy, GovernanceIndustry, InnovationQuick ReadAug 25

This brief examines the conflict-of-interest risks posed by AI agents and calls for imposing a duty of loyalty on developers and deployers.

Regulating Data Brokers in the Age of AI: A California Case Study
Anna-Maria Gueorguieva, Jennifer King, Apoorva Panidapu, Daniel E. Ho
Quick ReadAug 11, 2026
Policy Brief

This brief assesses data broker compliance with California privacy laws and calls for more stringent consumer protections.

Policy Brief

Regulating Data Brokers in the Age of AI: A California Case Study

Anna-Maria Gueorguieva, Jennifer King, Apoorva Panidapu, Daniel E. Ho
Privacy, Safety, SecurityRegulation, Policy, GovernanceQuick ReadAug 11

This brief assesses data broker compliance with California privacy laws and calls for more stringent consumer protections.

The World Model and Spatial Intelligence Era: Governing AI Beyond Language
Daniel Zhang, Russell Wald, Ehsan Adeli, Elena Cryst, Daniel E. Ho, Caroline Meinhardt, Jiajun Wu, Amy Zegart, Fei-Fei Li
Quick ReadJul 27, 2026
Issue Brief

This brief highlights the emergence of world models and outlines a first-of-its-kind governance and policy agenda for the technology.

Issue Brief

The World Model and Spatial Intelligence Era: Governing AI Beyond Language

Daniel Zhang, Russell Wald, Ehsan Adeli, Elena Cryst, Daniel E. Ho, Caroline Meinhardt, Jiajun Wu, Amy Zegart, Fei-Fei Li
Foundation ModelsRegulation, Policy, GovernanceIndustry, InnovationSpatial IntelligenceQuick ReadJul 27

This brief highlights the emergence of world models and outlines a first-of-its-kind governance and policy agenda for the technology.

Operationalizing Real-Time Monitoring of Clinical AI
Zhongnan Fang, Lina Cheuy, Hye Sun Na, Akshay Chaudhari, David B. Larson
Quick ReadMay 14, 2026
Policy Brief

This brief demonstrates how real-time monitoring can address critical gaps in the oversight of radiological AI tools.

Policy Brief

Operationalizing Real-Time Monitoring of Clinical AI

Zhongnan Fang, Lina Cheuy, Hye Sun Na, Akshay Chaudhari, David B. Larson
HealthcareRegulation, Policy, GovernanceQuick ReadMay 14

This brief demonstrates how real-time monitoring can address critical gaps in the oversight of radiological AI tools.