Response to NSF’s Request for Information on Research Ethics
Stanford scholars respond to a federal RFI related to research ethics, sharing lessons from their experience operating an ethical reflection process for research grants.
In collaboration with
Executive Summary
In this response to the National Science Foundation’s (NSF) request for information related to research ethics, a group of scholars affiliated with Stanford HAI, Stanford’s McCoy Family Center for Ethics in Society, and Stanford’s Ethics and Society Review (ESR) share lessons drawn from their five years of experience operating the ESR ethical reflection process as a requirement for HAI research grants. They make the case for promoting ethical and societal reflection within NSF’s grantmaking and highlight the common ethical issues that arise as part of AI research reviews.
Related Publications
How Can AI Support Language Digitization and Digital Inclusion?
This white paper analyzes the varying ways AI tools can advance language digitization work, and provides recommendations for responsibly realizing the potential of AI in supporting the digital inclusion of digitally disadvantaged languages.
This white paper analyzes the varying ways AI tools can advance language digitization work, and provides recommendations for responsibly realizing the potential of AI in supporting the digital inclusion of digitally disadvantaged languages.
Response to OSTP's Request for Information on Accelerating the American Scientific Enterprise
Stanford scholars respond to a federal RFI on scientific discovery, calling for the government to support a new “team science” academic research model for AI-enabled discovery.
Stanford scholars respond to a federal RFI on scientific discovery, calling for the government to support a new “team science” academic research model for AI-enabled discovery.
Moving Beyond the Term "Global South" in AI Ethics and Policy
This brief examines the limitations of the term "Global South" in AI ethics and policy, and highlights the importance of grounding such work in specific regions and power structures.
This brief examines the limitations of the term "Global South" in AI ethics and policy, and highlights the importance of grounding such work in specific regions and power structures.
Russ Altman’s Testimony Before the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
In this testimony presented to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions hearing titled “AI’s Potential to Support Patients, Workers, Children, and Families,” Russ Altman highlights opportunities for congressional support to make AI applications for patient care and drug discovery stronger, safer, and human-centered.
In this testimony presented to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions hearing titled “AI’s Potential to Support Patients, Workers, Children, and Families,” Russ Altman highlights opportunities for congressional support to make AI applications for patient care and drug discovery stronger, safer, and human-centered.