Stanford
University
  • Stanford Home
  • Maps & Directions
  • Search Stanford
  • Emergency Info
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy
  • Copyright
  • Trademarks
  • Non-Discrimination
  • Accessibility
© Stanford University.  Stanford, California 94305.
Finding Monosemantic Subspaces and Human-Compatible Interpretations in Vision Transformers through Sparse Coding | Stanford HAI

Stay Up To Date

Get the latest news, advances in research, policy work, and education program updates from HAI in your inbox weekly.

Sign Up For Latest News

Navigate
  • About
  • Events
  • Careers
  • Search
Participate
  • Get Involved
  • Support HAI
  • Contact Us
Skip to content
  • About

    • About
    • People
    • Get Involved with HAI
    • Support HAI
    • Subscribe to Email
  • Research

    • Research
    • Fellowship Programs
    • Grants
    • Student Affinity Groups
    • Centers & Labs
    • Research Publications
    • Research Partners
  • Education

    • Education
    • Executive and Professional Education
    • Government and Policymakers
    • K-12
    • Stanford Students
  • Policy

    • Policy
    • Policy Publications
    • Policymaker Education
    • Student Opportunities
  • AI Index

    • AI Index
    • AI Index Report
    • Global Vibrancy Tool
    • People
  • News
  • Events
  • Industry
  • Centers & Labs
research

Finding Monosemantic Subspaces and Human-Compatible Interpretations in Vision Transformers through Sparse Coding

Date
January 01, 2025
Topics
Computer Vision
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Read Paper
abstract

We present a new method of deconstructing class activation tokens of vision transformers into a new, overcomplete basis, where each basis vector is “monosemantic” and affiliated with a single, human-compatible conceptual description. We achieve this through the use of a highly optimized and customized version of the K-SVD algorithm, which we call Double-Batch K-SVD (DBK-SVD). We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach on the sbucaptions dataset, using CLIP embeddings and comparing our results to a Sparse Autoencoder (SAE) baseline. Our method significantly outperforms SAE in terms of reconstruction loss, recovering approximately 2/3 of the original signal compared to 1/6 for SAE. We introduce novel metrics for evaluating explanation faithfulness and specificity, showing that DBK-SVD produces more diverse and specific concept descriptions. We therefore show empirically for the first time that disentangling of concepts arising in Vision Transformers is possible, a statement that has previously been questioned when applying an additional sparsity constraint. Our research opens new avenues for model interpretability, failure mitigation, and downstream task domain transfer in vision transformer models. An interactive demo showcasing our results can be found at https://disentangling-sbucaptions.xyz, and we make our DBK-SVD implementation openly available at https://github.com/RomeoV/KSVD.jl.

Share
Link copied to clipboard!
Authors
  • Romeo Valentin
  • Vikas Sindhwan
  • Summeet Singh
  • Vincent Vanhoucke
  • Mykel Kochenderfer
    Mykel Kochenderfer
Related
  • Closed for the year
    Google Cloud Credit Grants
    Call for proposals will open up again in Summer 2026

    Aimed at supporting novel or emerging research that requires advanced computational resources provided by Google Cloud

Related Publications

ReMix: Optimizing Data Mixtures for Large Scale Imitation Learning
Joey Hejna, Chethan Anand Bhateja, Yichen Jiang, Karl Pertsch, Dorsa Sadigh
Sep 05, 2024
Research
Your browser does not support the video tag.

Increasingly large robotics datasets are being collected to train larger foundation models in robotics. However, despite the fact that data selection has been of utmost importance to scaling in vision and natural language processing (NLP), little work in robotics has questioned what data such models should actually be trained on. In this work we investigate how to weigh different subsets or "domains'' of robotics datasets during pre-training to maximize worst-case performance across all possible downstream domains using distributionally robust optimization (DRO). Unlike in NLP, we find that these methods are hard to apply out of the box due to varying action spaces and dynamics across robots. Our method, ReMix, employs early stopping and action normalization and discretization to counteract these issues. Through extensive experimentation on both the Bridge and OpenX datasets, we demonstrate that data curation can have an outsized impact on downstream performance. Specifically, domain weights learned by ReMix outperform uniform weights by over 40% on average and human-selected weights by over 20% on datasets used to train the RT-X models.

Research
Your browser does not support the video tag.

ReMix: Optimizing Data Mixtures for Large Scale Imitation Learning

Joey Hejna, Chethan Anand Bhateja, Yichen Jiang, Karl Pertsch, Dorsa Sadigh
Computer VisionRoboticsNatural Language ProcessingSep 05

Increasingly large robotics datasets are being collected to train larger foundation models in robotics. However, despite the fact that data selection has been of utmost importance to scaling in vision and natural language processing (NLP), little work in robotics has questioned what data such models should actually be trained on. In this work we investigate how to weigh different subsets or "domains'' of robotics datasets during pre-training to maximize worst-case performance across all possible downstream domains using distributionally robust optimization (DRO). Unlike in NLP, we find that these methods are hard to apply out of the box due to varying action spaces and dynamics across robots. Our method, ReMix, employs early stopping and action normalization and discretization to counteract these issues. Through extensive experimentation on both the Bridge and OpenX datasets, we demonstrate that data curation can have an outsized impact on downstream performance. Specifically, domain weights learned by ReMix outperform uniform weights by over 40% on average and human-selected weights by over 20% on datasets used to train the RT-X models.

The AI Arms Race In Health Insurance Utilization Review: Promises Of Efficiency And Risks Of Supercharged Flaws
Michelle Mello, Artem Trotsyuk, Abdoul Jalil Djiberou Mahamadou, Danton Char
Quick ReadJan 06, 2026
Research
Your browser does not support the video tag.

Health insurers and health care provider organizations are increasingly using artificial intelligence (AI) tools in prior authorization and claims processes. AI offers many potential benefits, but its adoption has raised concerns about the role of the “humans in the loop,” users’ understanding of AI, opacity of algorithmic determinations, underperformance in certain tasks, automation bias, and unintended social consequences. To date, institutional governance by insurers and providers has not fully met the challenge of ensuring responsible use. However, several steps could be taken to help realize the benefits of AI use while minimizing risks. Drawing on empirical work on AI use and our own ethical assessments of provider-facing tools as part of the AI governance process at Stanford Health Care, we examine why utilization review has attracted so much AI innovation and why it is challenging to ensure responsible use of AI. We conclude with several steps that could be taken to help realize the benefits of AI use while minimizing risks.

Research
Your browser does not support the video tag.

The AI Arms Race In Health Insurance Utilization Review: Promises Of Efficiency And Risks Of Supercharged Flaws

Michelle Mello, Artem Trotsyuk, Abdoul Jalil Djiberou Mahamadou, Danton Char
HealthcareRegulation, Policy, GovernanceQuick ReadJan 06

Health insurers and health care provider organizations are increasingly using artificial intelligence (AI) tools in prior authorization and claims processes. AI offers many potential benefits, but its adoption has raised concerns about the role of the “humans in the loop,” users’ understanding of AI, opacity of algorithmic determinations, underperformance in certain tasks, automation bias, and unintended social consequences. To date, institutional governance by insurers and providers has not fully met the challenge of ensuring responsible use. However, several steps could be taken to help realize the benefits of AI use while minimizing risks. Drawing on empirical work on AI use and our own ethical assessments of provider-facing tools as part of the AI governance process at Stanford Health Care, we examine why utilization review has attracted so much AI innovation and why it is challenging to ensure responsible use of AI. We conclude with several steps that could be taken to help realize the benefits of AI use while minimizing risks.

The Global AI Vibrancy Tool 2025
Loredana Fattorini, Nestor Maslej, Ray Perrault, Vanessa Parli, John Etchemendy, Yoav Shoham, Katrina Ligett
Deep DiveNov 24, 2025
Research
Your browser does not support the video tag.

This methodological paper presents the Global AI Vibrancy Tool, an interactive suite of visualizations designed to facilitate cross-country comparisons of AI vibrancy across countries, using indicators organized into pillars. The tool offers customizable features that enable users to conduct in-depth country-level comparisons and longitudinal analyses of AI-related metrics.

Research
Your browser does not support the video tag.

The Global AI Vibrancy Tool 2025

Loredana Fattorini, Nestor Maslej, Ray Perrault, Vanessa Parli, John Etchemendy, Yoav Shoham, Katrina Ligett
DemocracyIndustry, InnovationGovernment, Public AdministrationDeep DiveNov 24

This methodological paper presents the Global AI Vibrancy Tool, an interactive suite of visualizations designed to facilitate cross-country comparisons of AI vibrancy across countries, using indicators organized into pillars. The tool offers customizable features that enable users to conduct in-depth country-level comparisons and longitudinal analyses of AI-related metrics.

AI, Health, and Health Care Today and Tomorrow: The JAMA Summit Report on Artificial Intelligence
Tina Hernandez-Boussard, Michelle Mello, Nigam Shah, Co-authored by 50+ experts
Deep DiveOct 13, 2025
Research
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Research
Your browser does not support the video tag.

AI, Health, and Health Care Today and Tomorrow: The JAMA Summit Report on Artificial Intelligence

Tina Hernandez-Boussard, Michelle Mello, Nigam Shah, Co-authored by 50+ experts
HealthcareRegulation, Policy, GovernanceDeep DiveOct 13